Updates from Jim Randell Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 9:36 am on 7 July 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 2663: Missed the plot 

    From The Sunday Times, 6th October 2013 [link] [link]

    My friend has a triangular vegetable plot, all sides being whole numbers of metres. Coincidentally, the dimensions of the plot are such that its perimeter (in metres) is the same as its area (in square metres). Also, the length of one of the sides is the average of the lengths of the other two sides.

    What are the lengths of the sides of the plot?

    [teaser2663]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 9:37 am on 7 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      The triangle has sides of integer lengths (a, b, c) such that b = (a + c)/2.

      We can use Heron’s Formula [ @wikipedia ] to equate the area of the triangle with the perimeter, which gives us some restrictions on the sides of the triangle.

      However, we have encountered “equable” triangles before in Enigma 364, and generated a list of the 5 equable triangles, from which we can easily pick out the one that has one side that is an average of the other two.

      I also wrote code to generate k-equable triangles (integer sided triangles where the area is k times the perimeter), and that code can be reused here:

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      from enigma import irange, isqrt, divc, divf, printf
      
      # find all triangles with integer sides where area = k . perimeter
      def triangles(k=1):
        K = 4 * k * k
        for p in irange(1, isqrt(3 * K)):
          for q in irange(max(p, divc(K + 1, p)), divf(3 * K, p)):
            (r, z) = divmod(K * (p + q), p * q - K)
            if r < q: break
            if z == 0: yield (p + q, p + r, q + r)
      
      # consider 1-equable triangles
      for (a, b, c) in triangles(1):
        if b - a == c - b:
          printf("a={a} b={b} c={c}")
      

      Solution: The lengths of the sides of the plot are: 6m, 8m, 10m.

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 10:54 am on 8 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      
      for a in range (3, 25):
        for b in range (a+1, 25):
          for c in range(b+1, 25):
            # a < b < c and 2 * b = a + c
            if 2 * b != a + c: continue
            # Square of perimeter
            perim_sq = (a + b + c) ** 2
            # Area squared formula is based in Heron's formula
            area_sq = 1/16 *( 4*a*a*b*b - (a*a + b*b - c*c)**2)
            if perim_sq == area_sq:
              print(f"Length of sides are {a}, {b} and {c}m")
      
      # Length of sides are 6, 8 and 10m
      

      A (5,12,13) triangle has the area equal to the perimeter numerically, but does not have one side as the average of the other two sides.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 8:31 am on 5 July 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Brainteaser 1823: The special seven 

    From The Sunday Times, 24th August 1997 [link]

    A “special seven” fraction is one whose decimal expansion uses only 7s and/or 0s. So examples of special sevens are:

    0.7707
    0.70707070…

    which are the decimal expansions of:

    7707/10000
    70/99

    respectively.

    You can set yourself all sorts of tasks with the special sevens. For example, is it possible to find some which add up to 1? In fact this is possible in many different ways, but…

    … what is the smallest number of special sevens adding to 1?

    This puzzle is included in the book Brainteasers (2002). The puzzle text above is taken from the book.

    [teaser1823]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 8:32 am on 5 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Each “special seven” number corresponds to a “special one” number, which can be derived by dividing by 7.

      So if we find a collection of special sevens that sum to 1, there is a corresponding set of special ones that sum to 1/7.

      The decimal expansion of 1/7 = 0.(142857)…

      Which if we write it as a sum of special ones will require at least 8 of them to construct the 8 digit.

      Solution: The smallest number of special sevens that sum to 1 is 8.


      We can construct a collection of 8 special ones that sum to 1/7 as follows:

      0.(000100)...  [h]
      0.(000101)...  [g] = [f]
      0.(000101)...  [f]
      0.(000111)...  [e]
      0.(010111)...  [d] = [c]
      0.(010111)...  [c]
      0.(011111)...  [b]
      0.(111111)...  [a]
      -------------
      0.(142857)...
      

      (This is not the only set, the 0’s and 1’s in each column can be re-ordered to give other sets, and there is no reason why each recurring section should use the same arrangement of columns).

      Writing these as fractions (from [a] to [h]) we have:

      [a] = 0.(111111)... = 111111/999999 = 1/9
      [b] = 0.(011111)... = 11111/999999
      [c] = 0.(010111)... = 10111/999999
      [d] = 0.(010111)... = 10111/999999
      [e] = 0.(000111)... = 111/999999 = 1/9009
      [f] = 0.(000101)... = 101/999999
      [g] = 0.(000101)... = 101/999999
      [h] = 0.(000100)... = 100/999999
      

      Which sum to: 142857/999999 = 1/7 as required.

      Multiplying these values by 7 gives us a set of 8 special sevens that sum to 1:

      [a] = 0.(777777)... = 777777/999999 = 7/9
      [b] = 0.(077777)... = 77777/999999
      [c] = 0.(070777)... = 70777/999999
      [d] = 0.(070777)... = 70777/999999
      [e] = 0.(000777)... = 777/999999 = 7/9009
      [f] = 0.(000707)... = 707/999999
      [g] = 0.(000707)... = 707/999999
      [h] = 0.(000700)... = 700/999999
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 5:14 pm on 3 July 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 3015: Quid pro quo 

    From The Sunday Times, 5th July 2020 [link] [link]

    In Readiland the unit of currency is the quid. Notes are available in two denominations and with these notes it is possible to make any three-figure number of quid. However, you need a mixture of the denominations to make exactly 100 quid. Furthermore, there is only one combination of denominations that will give a total of 230 quid.

    What are the two denominations?

    [teaser3015]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 5:32 pm on 3 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      See also: Enigma 228, Enigma 1194, Enigma 1154.

      If we suppose the denominations are x and y (where gcd(x, y) = 1). Then the largest amount that cannot be made using the denominations is given by F(x, y) = xy − x − y.

      Both denominations are needed to make 100, so they must both be less than 100, and neither can be a divisor of 100.

      The following Python 3 program runs in 67ms.

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      from enigma import (coprime_pairs, express, printf)
      
      # consider denominations x, y
      for (x, y) in coprime_pairs(97):
        if 100 % x == 0 or 100 % y == 0: continue
      
        # largest inexpressible amount is < 100
        if not (x * y - x - y < 100): continue
      
        # there is exactly 1 way to express 230
        e230s = list(express(230, (x, y)))
        if len(e230s) != 1: continue
      
        # output solution
        printf("x={x} y={y}; 100 -> {e100s}, 230 -> {e230s}", e100s=list(express(100, (x, y))))
      

      Solution: The two denominations are 3 quid and 49 quid.

      The largest amount that cannot be made using these denominations is 95 quid. All larger amounts are possible.

      The only way to make 100 quid is 17× 3 quid + 1× 49 quid.

      The only way to make 230 quid is 44× 3 quid + 2× 49 quid.


      Manually:

      The largest integer that is not expressible in k different ways using denominations x, y is given by:

      F[k](x, y) = kxy − x − y

      So we need to find co-prime values for x, y, less than 100 that are not divisors of 100, and the following hold:

      F[1](x, y) < 100
      F[2](x, y) ≥ 230

      This will ensure that all 3-digit amounts are expressible, and that to make 100 requires both denominations. All that remains for each pair of candidate denominations is to determine if there is a unique expression for 230.

      Given a value for x we can use the inequalities to find a range of viable values for y.

      Starting with x = 3, gives y = 47 .. 51 and only y = 47, 49 are co-prime with x.

      230 can be expressed in two ways using (3, 47): 230 = 14× 3 + 4× 47 = 61× 3 + 1× 47.

      230 can be expressed in only one way using (3, 49): 230 = 44× 3 + 2× 49.

      So (3, 49) is a viable solution.

      For x = 4, we get only y = 34, but x divides 100, so this is not a candidate solution.

      And for larger values of x there are no possibilities for y, so we are done.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 8:37 am on 2 July 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 2748: I go up and up 

    From The Sunday Times, 24th May 2015 [link] [link]

    I have in mind an arithmetic progression; ie, a sequence which goes up and up by a fixed amount (such as 1, 10, 19, 28, …) and — as in that example — one of the terms of my progression will eventually be 10000. But I have coded the numbers by consistently replacing digits by letters and in this way the arithmetic progression has become

    I, GO, UP, AND, …

    Find the value of POUND.

    This puzzle is not included in the book The Sunday Times Brain Teasers Book 1 (2019).

    [teaser2748]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 8:38 am on 2 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      We can use the [[ SubstitutedExpression() ]] solver from the enigma.py library to solve this puzzle.

      The following run file executes in 93ms.

      Run: [ @replit ]

      #! python -m enigma -rr
      
      SubstitutedExpression
      
      # the given terms must be evenly spaced
      "GO - I == UP - GO"
      "UP - GO == AND - UP"
      
      # and eventually we reach 10000
      "div(10000 - I, GO - I) > 0"
      
      --answer="POUND"
      

      Solution: POUND = 28706.

      The first 4 terms in the progression are:

      4, 38, 72, 106, …

      Each term being derived from the previous term by adding 34. So the sequence is:

      S(n) = 4 + 34n
      S(294) = 10000

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 8:07 pm on 21 October 2021 Permalink | Reply

      
      from itertools import permutations
      
      for p1 in permutations('1234567890', 8):
        A, D, G, I, N, O, U, P = p1
        if '0' in (I, G, U, A, P): continue
        I = int(I)
        GO, UP, AND = int(G + O), int(U + P), int(A + N + D)
        if GO - I == UP - GO == AND - UP:
          POUND = int(P + O + U + N + D)
          # Look for a term with a value of 10000
          for n in range (1,500):
            # nth term of an arithmetic series
            if I + (n - 1)*(UP - GO) == 10000:
              print(f"POUND = {POUND}")
              print(f"I={I}, GO={GO}, UP={UP}, AND={AND}")
                           
      # POUND = 28706
      # I=4, GO=38, UP=72, AND=106   
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 9:25 am on 30 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Brain-Teaser 524: [Digit sums] 

    From The Sunday Times, 27th June 1971 [link]

    At a party at my friend Smith’s house recently, we were watching a rather attractive couple who were evidently enjoying each other’s company.

    “I don’t know those two”, I said, “but I should be interested to know the lady’s age”.

    “Well, I’m not the man to be explicit about that subject”, said Smith, “even though I know she’s rather proud of it. But her age is the sum of the digits in the sum of the digits in all the numbers from one to a hundred thousand inclusive”.

    “Certainly not very explicit”, I said, “but then, how old is her companion?”

    “Believe it or not”, said Smith, “but his age is the sum of the digits in the sum of the digits in all the numbers from one to a million inclusive”.

    What was the difference between their ages?

    This puzzle was originally published with no title.

    [teaser524]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 9:26 am on 30 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      It is not too onerous to tackle the problem directly using Python.

      This program counts the digits in each of the required sequences. It runs in 405ms.

      Run: [ @replit ]

      from enigma import (fcompose, nsplit, irange, printf)
      
      # sum the digits in a number
      dsum = fcompose(nsplit, sum)
      
      # sum the digits of the numbers in a sequence
      dsums = lambda s: sum(map(dsum, s))
      
      # age of the lady
      a1 = dsum(dsums(irange(1, 100_000)))
      
      # age of the gentleman
      a2 = dsum(dsums(irange(1, 1_000_000)))
      
      printf("a1={a1} a2={a2}, diff={d}", d=abs(a1 - a2))
      

      Solution: They are the same age, so the difference is 0.


      But it is also fairly straightforward so solve analytically:

      If we suppose DS(k) is the sum of the digits in the integers (represented in base 10), starting from 0, that are less than k, then:

      The sum of the digits in 0 .. 9 is 45.

      DS(10^1) = 45

      If we then consider numbers from 0 .. 99, the units digits comprise 10 lots of DS(10), and the tens digits comprise another 10 lots of DS(10):

      DS(10^2) = 20 DS(10^1) = 900

      For the digits from 0 .. 999, the tens and units digits together comprise 10 lots of DS(100), and the hundreds digits comprise 100 lots of DS(10).

      DS(10^3) = 10 DS(10^2) + 100 DS(10^1) = 13,500

      Carrying on this construction we find:

      DS(10^n) = 45n × 10^(n − 1)

      (See: OEIS A034967 [ @oeis ]).

      The sums we are interested in are therefore:

      DS(10^5) = 45×5×(10^4) = 2,250,000
      DS(10^6) = 45×6×(10^5) = 27,000,000

      The extra 0 at the beginning doesn’t make any difference, but we need to add in the digits for the end points, which are both powers of 10, so only contribute an extra 1.

      So we are interested in the digit sums of 2,250,001 and 27,000,001, both of which are 10.

      So both ages are 10, and their difference is 0.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 8:10 am on 28 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: by: Colin   

    Brainteaser 1822: Teasing triangles 

    From The Sunday Times, 17th August 1997 [link]

    Each of the ten line segments in the picture have been given a different whole number value from 0 to 9. A figure shown in a triangle equals the sum of the three values assigned to the sides of the triangle. The figures which have not been given from the other two triangles are the same as each other and the two add together to give a perfect square.

    What are the numbers assigned to each side?

    This puzzle is included in the book Brainteasers (2002). The puzzle text above is taken from the book.

    [teaser1822]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 8:11 am on 28 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      We can use the [[ SubstitutedExpression() ]] solver from the enigma.py library to solve this puzzle.

      The following run file executes in 96ms.

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      #! python -m enigma -rr
      
      SubstitutedExpression
      
      # regions given
      "A + F + G = 9"
      "E + F + H = 7"
      "C + I + J = 23"
      
      # remaining regions have the same value...
      "B + G + J == D + H + I"
      # ... and sum to a square
      "is_square(B + D + G + H + I + J)"
      
      # suppress verbose output
      --template=""
      

      Solution: The numbers assigned to each line are shown below:

      Like

      • Jim Randell's avatar

        Jim Randell 12:38 pm on 30 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

        The puzzle as originally published in The Sunday Times was worded as follows:

        Each of the ten line segments in the picture have been given a different whole number value from 0 to 9. A figure shown in a triangle equals the sum of the three values assigned to the sides of the triangle. The figures which have not been given from the other two triangles when added together to give 30. What is the value assigned to CD?

        CD being the external edge of the 23 triangle (which is the value C in my solution).

        We can adjust the run-file accordingly:

        #! python -m enigma -rr
        
        SubstitutedExpression
        
        # regions given
        "A + F + G = 9"
        "E + F + H = 7"
        "C + I + J = 23"
        
        # the other two triangles added together to give 30
        "B + D + G + H + I + J = 30"
        
        --answer="C"
        
        # suppress verbose output
        --template=""
        

        And we find that there are 24 ways to fill out the numbers, but the value on the required edge is always 9.

        Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 4:09 pm on 29 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      
      % A Solution in MiniZinc
      include "globals.mzn";
      
      % using the vertex labels A,B,C,D and E (as original diagram in link)
      % plus F for the central point
      
      % outside edges of the pentagon
      var 0..9:AB; var 0..9:BC; var 0..9:CD; var 0..9:DE; var 0..9:EA;
      
      % internal lines to central point F
      var 0..9:AF; var 0..9:BF; var 0..9:CF; var 0..9:DF; var 0..9:EF;
      
      constraint all_different ([AB, BC, CD, DE, EA, AF, BF, CF, DF, EF]);
      
      % three given triangles are AEF, ABF and CDF
      constraint AF + EF + EA == 7;
      constraint AB + AF + BF == 9;
      constraint CF + DF + CD == 23;
      
      % the other two triangle sides (BCF and DEF) are the same total 
      % and the two add together to give a perfect square
      
      constraint DE + EF + DF == BF + CF + BC;
      
      set of int: sq = {16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81};
      constraint (DE + EF + DF + BF + CF + BC) in sq;
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      % AB = 0; BC = 3; CD = 6; DE = 5; EA = 1;
      % AF = 2; BF = 7; CF = 8; DF = 9; EF = 4;
      % % time elapsed: 0.06 s
      % ----------
      % ==========
      
      

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 1:46 pm on 8 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      My solution below is updated for the original Sunday Times description, the solution above being the solution being based on the teaser in the book Brainteasers (2002, edited by Victor Bryant).

      
      % A Solution in MiniZinc - original Sunday Times teaser
      include "globals.mzn";
       
      % using the vertex labels A,B,C,D and E (as original ST diagram in link)
      % plus F for the central point
       
      % outside edges of the pentagon
      var 0..9:AB; var 0..9:BC; var 0..9:CD; var 0..9:DE; var 0..9:EA;
       
      % internal lines to central point F
      var 0..9:AF; var 0..9:BF; var 0..9:CF; var 0..9:DF; var 0..9:EF;
       
      constraint all_different ([AB, BC, CD, DE, EA, AF, BF, CF, DF, EF]);
       
      % three given triangles are AEF, ABF and CDF
      constraint AF + EF + EA == 7;
      constraint AB + AF + BF == 9;
      constraint CF + DF + CD == 23;
      
      % for figures in triangles not given ie triangles DEF and BCF
      constraint DE + EF + DF + BF + CF + BC == 30; 
       
      solve satisfy;
      output ["CD = " ++ show(CD) ];
      
      % CD = 9
      % ----------
      % ==========
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 5:08 pm on 26 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 3014: Family business 

    From The Sunday Times, 28th June 2020 [link] [link]

    George and Martha run a company with their five daughters. The telephone extensions all have four positive unequal digits and strangely only four digits appear in the seven extensions:

    Andrea: ABCD
    Bertha: ACDB
    Caroline: BACD
    Dorothy: DABC
    Elizabeth: DBCA
    George: CABD
    Martha: CDAB

    They noticed the following:

    Andrea’s and Bertha’s add up to Dorothy’s.
    Bertha’s and Elizabeth’s add up to George’s.
    Caroline’s and Dorothy’s add up to Martha’s.

    What is Andrea’s extension?

    [teaser3014]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 5:14 pm on 26 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Any one of the expressions is sufficient to determine the answer.

      I used the [[ SubstitutedExpression.split_sum() ]] solver from the enigma.py library to evaluate the alphametic expressions.

      The following run file executes in 77ms. (Internal runtime of the generated code is just 39µs).

      #! python3 -m enigma -rr
      
      SubstitutedExpression.split_sum
      
      --invalid="0,ABCD"
      
      "ABCD + ACDB = DABC"
      "ACDB + DBCA = CABD"
      "BACD + DABC = CDAB"
      
      --answer="ABCD"
      

      Solution: Andrea’s extension is 2385.


      Here’s my manual solution:

      We can split each of the three sums into columns to give us partial equations, that may have a carry out or a carry in.

      B + D = C appears at both the left- and right-hand side of a sum, so can’t have a carry in or a carry out, so it is a complete equation.

      We then see that the partial sum BC + CD = AB cannot have a carry in, so the sum A + B = D is also a complete equation.

      The sum A + A = D cannot have a carry out, and if it does not have a carry in then we deduce that B = A, which is not possible. So it does have a carry in, and B = A + 1 is a complete equation.

      Using these three complete equations we derive:

      B = A + 1
      D = 2A + 1
      C = 3A + 2

      For digits in the range 1-9 the only viable values are:

      A = 1, B = 2, C = 5, D = 3
      A = 2, B = 3, C = 8, D = 5

      Only one of these assignment works in the original three sums, so we have the answer.

      Or, we can use the partial equation BC + CD = AB, which we now know must have a carry out, to give a fourth complete equation: 9B + 11C + D = 10A + 100. We can then substitute in the other equations to get the value of A, and from that the remaining values:

      9B + 11C + D = 10A + 100
      9(A + 1) + 11(3A + 2) + (2A + 1) = 10A + 100
      44A + 32 = 10A + 100
      34A = 68

      A = 2, B = 3, C = 8, D = 5

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 9:19 am on 27 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I simulated a normal addition sum in MiniZinc for the first equation to find an answer.

      The values obtained confirmed the other two equations.

      % A Solution in MiniZinc
      include "globals.mzn";
       
      % Using the first equation only ie Andrea + Bertha = Dorothy
      % 
      %  A B C D
      %  A C D B
      %  -------
      %  D A B C
      %  -------
      
      var 1..9:A; var 1..9:B; var 1..9:C; var 1..9:D;
      var 0..1:carry1; var 0..1:carry2; var 0..1:carry3; 
      
      constraint C == (B + D) mod 10 
      /\ carry1 = (B + D) div 10;
      
      constraint B = (carry1 + C + D) mod 10 /\ 
      carry2 = (carry1 + C + D) div 10;
      
      constraint A = (carry2 + B + C) mod 10
      /\ carry3 = (carry2 + B + C) div 10;
      
      constraint D = carry3 + 2*A;
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      output ["A,B,C,D = " ++ show([A,B,C,D]) ];
      
      
      

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 2:41 pm on 27 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      A short Python programme confirms that the second and third equations give the same value for Andrea’s extension as my MiniZinc programme for the first equation:

      
      from itertools import permutations
      
      # Bertha’s and Elizabeth’s extensions add up to George’s extn.
      # 2nd Equation: ACDB + DBCA = CABD
      
      for p in permutations((1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),4):
          a, b, c, d = p
          acdb = 1000*a + 100*c + 10*d + b
          dbca = 1000*d + 100*b + 10*c + a
          cabd = 1000*c + 100*a + 10*b + d
          if acdb + dbca == cabd:
              # Find Andrea's extension
              abcd = 1000*a + 100*b + 10*c + d
              print("2. Andrea's extension =", abcd)
      
      # Caroline’s and Dorothy’s extensions add up to Martha’s extn.
      # 3rd Equation : BACD + DABC = CDAB
      
      for p in permutations((1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),4):
          a, b, c, d = p
          bacd = 1000*b + 100*a + 10*c + d
          dabc = 1000*d + 100*a + 10*b + c
          cdab = 1000*c + 100*d + 10*a + b
          if bacd + dabc == cdab:
              # Find Andrea's extension
              abcd = 1000*a + 100*b + 10*c + d
              print("3. Andrea's extension =", abcd)
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 7:16 am on 25 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Brain-Teaser 1: Tall story 

    From The Sunday Times, 26th February 1961 [link]

    “We’re a biggish family in more ways than one”, said Jeremy. “Five, including triplets, and three of us the same height. I’m 6 ft. and aged 72; Jim is three inches taller than John and three years older; and John and Julian’s combined heights are 5 ft. 11 in. more than Joe’s and their combined ages 71 years more than his. Our aggregate height in inches equals our aggregate age in years, but no one’s age in years equals Joe’s height in inches”.

    What were the name, age and height of the tallest of the triplets?

    This was the first of the regular Teaser puzzles published in The Sunday Times. It was accompanied by the following introduction:

    Brain-Teasers: a Weekly Feature

    Great numbers of our readers have found entertainment and interest in the Brain-Teasers, or mathematical problems, which we have published from time to time, usually at holiday week-ends. Now we intend to make them a weekly feature of The Sunday Times.

    Readers themselves have supplied many of the best of the problems in the past, and we invite them to continue to do so. A fee of £10 will be paid for each problem accepted.

    Problems should fulfil the following conditions: Both the problem and the solution must be expressible in reasonably brief compass. No advanced or specialist mathematical techniques should be necessary. Solutions should be unique, or otherwise admit of no uncertainty in judging. Problems must be original. Diagrams are admissible if they are not too complicated.

    The problem below is the invention of a reader who observes: “Any who are stumped by it after the expiry of an hour should feel cause for concern”.

    A prize of £3 was offered.

    [teaser1]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 7:17 am on 25 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      We can associate values (A, B, C, D, E) with (Jez, Jim, Jon, Jul, Joe), that correspond to either their heights in inches or their ages in years, both give rise to the same set of equations:

      A = 72
      B = C + 3
      C + D = E + 71
      x = y = z

      where (x, y, z) are some three of (A, B, C, D, E).

      This gives us a set of 5 simultaneous equations in 5 variables.

      This Python program finds solutions to these equations (using the [[ Matrix.linear() ]] solver from the enigma.py library), groups the solutions by the sum of the set of values, and then looks for two sets with the same sum (one set for the ages, and another set for the height) that satisfy the condition that Joe’s height does not appear in the set of ages.

      It runs in 55ms.

      Run: [ @replit ]

      from enigma import (Matrix, subsets, as_int, multiset, group, printf)
      
      # labels for the people involved
      # A = Jez, B = Jim, C = Jon, D = Jul, E = Joe
      labels = (A, B, C, D, E) = (0, 1, 2, 3, 4)
      
      # solve equations specified as: (ps, ms, k)
      # for integer solutions
      def solve(eqs):
        (A, B) = (list(), list())
        for (ps, ms, k) in eqs:
          eq = [0] * 5
          for (i, n) in multiset.from_seq(ps).items(): eq[i] += n
          for (i, n) in multiset.from_seq(ms).items(): eq[i] -= n
          A.append(eq)
          B.append(k)
        try:
          # find values that are positive integers
          return Matrix.linear(A, B, valid=(lambda x: as_int(x, include='+')))
        except ValueError:
          return
      
      # find values that satisfy the equations
      def generate():
        # choose the three with the same value
        for (x, y, z) in subsets(labels, size=3):
          # solve the equations
          r = solve([
            ([A], [], 72), # A = 72
            ([B], [C], 3), # B = C + 3
            ([C, D], [E], 71), # C + D = E + 71
            ([x], [y], 0), # x = y
            ([y], [z], 0), # y = z
          ])
          if r is None: continue
          # check there is a set of triplets
          if not (3 in multiset.from_seq(r).values()): continue
          # return candidate solutions
          yield r
      
      # group sets of solutions by the sum of the values
      d = group(generate(), by=sum)
      
      # consider values for the sum
      for (t, rs) in d.items():
        # choose two sets of values for the ages and heights
        for (age, height) in subsets(rs, size=2, select="M"):
          # no one's age is the same as Joe's height
          if height[E] in age: continue
          for (n, a, h) in zip("Jez Jim Jon Jul Joe".split(), age, height):
            printf("{n}: age {a} yr, height {h} in")
          printf()
      

      Solution: Jim is the tallest of the triplets. His age is 72, his height is 6ft 2in.

      The complete characteristics are:

      Jez: age 72 yr, height 72 in
      Jim: age 72 yr, height 74 in
      Jon: age 69 yr, height 71 in
      Jul: age 74 yr, height 71 in
      Joe: age 72 yr, height 71 in

      So: Jeremy, Jim, Joe are the triplets (same age), and: John, Julian, Joe are the same height.

      There are 7 ways to solve the equations, but there is only one pair that has the same sum, and this gives rise to the solution.

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 4:10 pm on 25 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I found three solutions in MinZinc.

      The first solution was invaiid as there was no single maximum height.

      The second solution was the same as Jim’s solution above.

      There appears to be another solution, which gives the maximum height of Jim as 6ft 3 in, with an age of 75 years. If the puzzle had stated that age and height could not be the same, then this last solution could be ruled out – it appears to conform to the stated conditions in the puzzle.

      
      % A Solution in MiniZinc
      include "globals.mzn";
       
      var 10..99: JezAge; var 10..99: JimAge; var 10..99: JonAge; 
      var 10..99: JulAge; var 10..99: JoeAge; 
      
      var 50..80: JezHt; var 50..80: JimHt; var 50..80: JonHt; 
      var 50..80: JulHt; var 50..80: JoeHt; 
      
      % Three of us the same height
      % (A,B,C,D,E) = (Jez, Jim, Jon, Jul, Joe)
      constraint (JezHt == JimHt /\ JimHt == JonHt)  % ABC
      \/ (JezHt == JimHt /\ JimHt == JulHt)   % ABD
      \/ (JezHt == JimHt /\ JimHt == JoeHt)   % ABE
      \/ (JezHt == JonHt /\ JonHt == JulHt)   % ACD
      \/ (JezHt == JonHt /\ JonHt == JoeHt)   % ACE
      \/ (JezHt == JulHt /\ JulHt == JoeHt)   % ADE
      \/ (JimHt == JonHt /\ JonHt == JulHt)   % BCD
      \/ (JimHt == JonHt /\ JonHt == JoeHt)   % BCE
      \/ (JimHt == JulHt /\ JulHt == JoeHt)   % BDE
      \/ (JonHt == JulHt /\ JulHt == JoeHt);  % CDE
      
      % Three of us the same age(triplets)
      constraint (JezAge == JimAge /\ JimAge == JonAge)  % ABC
      \/ (JezAge == JimAge /\ JimAge == JulAge)   % ABD
      \/ (JezAge == JimAge /\ JimAge == JoeAge)   % ABE
      \/ (JezAge == JonAge /\ JonAge == JulAge)   % ACD
      \/ (JezAge == JonAge /\ JonAge == JoeAge)   % ACE
      \/ (JezAge == JulAge /\ JulAge == JoeAge)   % ADE
      \/ (JimAge == JonAge /\ JonAge == JulAge)   % BCD
      \/ (JimAge == JonAge /\ JonAge == JoeAge)   % BCE
      \/ (JimAge == JulAge /\ JulAge == JoeAge)   % BDE
      \/ (JonAge == JulAge /\ JulAge == JoeAge);  % CDE
      
      % Jez is 6 ft. and aged 72
      constraint JezHt == 72 /\ JezAge == 72;
      
      % Jim is three inches taller than John and three years older
      constraint JimHt - 3 == JonHt /\ JimAge - 3 == JonAge;
      
      %  John and Julian’s combined heights are 5 ft. 11 in. more than Joe’s
      %  and their combined ages 71 years more than his
      constraint JonHt + JulHt - 71 == JoeHt;  
      constraint JonAge + JulAge - 71 == JoeAge;
      
      % Our aggregate height in inches equals our aggregate age in years
      constraint  JimHt + JezHt + JulHt + JonHt + JoeHt 
      == JimAge + JezAge + JulAge  + JonAge + JoeAge;
      
      % No one’s age in years equals Joe’s height in inches
      constraint JoeHt != JezAge /\ JoeHt != JimAge
      /\ JoeHt != JonAge /\ JoeHt != JulAge;
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      output ["Ages: " ++ show([JezAge, JimAge, JonAge, JulAge, JoeAge])]++
      ["\nHeights: " ++ show([JezHt, JimHt, JonHt, JulHt, JoeHt])];
      
      %           Jez Jim Jon Jul Joe
      % Ages:    [72, 72, 69, 72, 70]  << no single tallest member 
      % Heights: [72, 72, 69, 72, 70]  << Therefore, an invalid solution
      % ----------
      % Ages:    [72, 72, 69, 74, 72]  <<  Jim is tallest member at 6 ft. 2 in.
      % Heights: [72, 74, 71, 71, 71]  <<  with an age of 72 years
      % ----------
      % Ages:    [72, 75, 72, 72, 73]  << Jim is tallest member at 6 ft. 3 in.
      % Heights: [72, 75, 72, 72, 73]  <<  with an age of 75 years
      % ----------
      % ==========
      
      
      

      Like

      • Jim Randell's avatar

        Jim Randell 4:15 pm on 25 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

        @Geoff: The condition “no one’s age in years equals Joe’s height in inches”, means that Joe’s age is not equal to Joe’s height. So this disposes of two of your solutions. (And effectively means that the same set of solutions cannot be used for both ages and heights).

        Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 4:38 pm on 25 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      @Jim: Fair point. I was interpreting only other people’s ages only could not be equal to Joe’s height. It could have been more clearly stated that this condition also applied to Joe himself!

      Like

    • Frits's avatar

      Frits 3:51 pm on 28 July 2020 Permalink | Reply

      from enigma import SubstitutedExpression, icount #, multiset
      
      # suppose Jez not part of three --> Also either Jon or Jim not part of three 
      #   --> Joe and Jul part of three --> Jez = 72, Jon = 71, Jim 74, Joe = 71, Jul = 71 or
      #       (Jon has to be 71)            Jez = 72, Jon = 71, Jim 74, Joe = 74, Jul = 74 
      # suppose Jez part of three 
      #   --> if both Jim and Jon not part of three --> Jon = 71, Jim = 74
      #       else Jim or Jon is 72 --> Jez = 72, Jon = 72, Jim 75, Jul == Joe - 1 or
      #                                 Jez = 72, Jon = 69, Jim 72, Jul == Joe + 2
      # --> Joe 70-74
      # --> Jim 72,74,75
      # --> Jul 71,72,74
      # --> Jon 69,71,72
          
      
      # the alphametic puzzle
      p = SubstitutedExpression(
        [
          #  Jez Age    Joe Age    Jim Age    Jul Age    Jon Age
          #    AB         CD         EF         GH         IJ     
          #  Jez Hght   Joe Hght   Jim Hght   Jul Hght   Jon Hght
          #    KL         MN         OP         QR         ST   
          
          # Jez is 6 ft. and aged 72
          "AB = 72", "KL = 72",
        
          # Jim is three inches taller than John and three years older
          "IJ + 3 == EF" ,"ST + 3 = OP",
         
          # Jul and Jon's combined heights are 5 ft 11 in more than Joe's
          # and their combined ages 71 years more than his
          "QR + ST == MN + 71", "GH + IJ == CD + 71",
          
          # aggregate height in inches equals aggregate age in years
          "AB + CD + EF + GH + IJ == KL + MN + OP + QR + ST",
          
          # No one's age in years equals Joe's height in inches
          "AB != MN", "CD != MN", "EF != MN", "GH != MN", "IJ != MN",
          
          # Three have the same age, three have same height
          "icount([AB, CD, EF, GH, IJ], (lambda d: v([AB, CD, EF, GH, IJ]) == d)) == 3",
          "icount([KL, MN, OP, QR, ST], (lambda d: v([KL, MN, OP, QR, ST]) == d)) == 3",
          #"sorted(multiset.from_seq([AB, CD, EF, GH, IJ]).values()) == [1, 1, 3]",
          #"sorted(multiset.from_seq([KL, MN, OP, QR, ST]).values()) == [1, 1, 3]",
          
          # ----------------------------
          # try to speed up 
          # ----------------------------
          
          #"CD in ([70,71,72,73,74])",
          #"EF in ([72,74,75])",
          #"GH in ([71,72,74])",
          #"IJ in ([69,71,72])",
          
          #"MN in ([70,71,72,73,74])",
          #"OP in ([72,74,75])",
          #"QR in ([71,72,74])",
          #"ST in ([69,71,72])",
        ],
        distinct="", 
        code="v = lambda x: max(x,key=x.count)",
        answer="AB, CD, EF, GH, IJ, KL, MN, OP, QR, ST"
      )      
                                
      # Print answers
      
      for (_, ans) in p.solve(verbose=0): 
         print("        Age        |       Height") 
         print("Jez Joe Jim Jul Jon Jez Joe Jim Jul Jon")
         print(ans)
         
      # Output:   
      #         Age        |       Height
      # Jez Joe Jim Jul Jon Jez Joe Jim Jul Jon
      # (72, 72, 72, 74, 69, 72, 71, 74, 71, 71) 
      

      Remarks regarding speed:

      "IJ + 3 == EF" ,"ST + 3 = OP",  # Approx 1.3 secs
      "IJ + 3 = EF" ,"ST + 3 == OP",  # Approx 14 secs
      "IJ + 3 = EF" ,"ST + 3 = OP",   # Approx 14 secs
      "IJ + 3 == EF" ,"ST + 3 == OP", # SyntaxError: too many statically nested blocks
      

      The speed up logic I had to invent before I discovered the “IJ + 3 == EF” ,”ST + 3 = OP” equations.
      In theory the multiset equations are too restrictive

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 8:52 am on 23 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 2525: [Sandwich numbers] 

    From The Sunday Times, 13th February 2011 [link] [link]

    “Sandwich numbers” are those of the form BFB, where B is the bread and is a single digit, and F is the filling of any length: BFB has to be divisible by F. For example, 11371 is a sandwich with filling 137 since 11371 = 83 × 137. Incidentally, all of 21372, 31373, … , 91379 are also sandwich numbers, and these nine are said to make up a “sandwich box”.

    The filling in my sandwich box today is the smallest beginning with a 3.

    What is my filling?

    This puzzle was originally published with no title.

    [teaser2525]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 8:58 am on 23 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      My first thought was to generate integers that start with a 3, and then check to see if they make a “sandwich box”. But this was taking a long time, so here’s some analysis to produce a faster program:

      If f is an n digit “filling” number, then the corresponding sandwich numbers in a sandwich box are:

      b.10^(n + 1) + 10.f + b

      for b = 1 .. 9. And each of these must be divisible by f.

      Clearly f will divide the 10.f part, which leaves b(10^(n + 1) + 1), when b = 1, we must have f divides (10^(n + 1) + 1), and if this is the case f will divide the remaining sandwich numbers with b > 1.

      So, f must be a divisor of (10^(n + 1) + 1), and we are looking for the smallest f that starts with a 3.

      f.g = 10^(n + 1) + 1

      and f is an n digit number that starts with 3, so g = 26 .. 33.

      This Python program runs in 49ms. (Internal runtime is 46µs).

      Run: [ @replit ]

      from enigma import (irange, inf, printf)
      
      def solve():
        # consider n digit fillings
        x = 101
        for n in irange(1, inf):
          # f is an n digit divisor of x
          for g in irange(33, 26, step=-1):
            (f, r) = divmod(x, g)
            if r == 0:
              yield f
          x *= 10
          x -= 9
      
      for f in solve():
        printf("f = {f}")
        break
      

      Solution: The smallest filling beginning with 3 is: f = 3448275862069.

      Where: 29f = 10^14 + 1.

      So we see why the simple program was taking so long. (In the end it took 32 minutes).

      In fact there is a family of filling numbers that start with 3 that take the form:

      344827586206 [8965517241379310344827586206] 9

      where the section in brackets can be included 0 or more times, to give fillings with length (13 + 28k) digits.

      We can adapt the program to generate all filling numbers without the restriction that the leading digit is 3.

      from enigma import (irange, inf, match, printf)
      
      # generate "filling" numbers
      def filling():
        # consider n digit fillings
        x = 101
        for n in irange(1, inf):
          # f is an n digit divisor of x
          M = x // 10
          for g in irange(101, 11, step=-1):
            (f, r) = divmod(x, g)
            if r == 0 and f < M <= 10 * f:
              yield f
          x *= 10
          x -= 9
      
      for f in filling():
        printf("f = {f}")
        if match(f, '3*'): break
      

      See: OIES A116436 [ @oeis.org ]

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 9:48 am on 21 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Brain-Teaser 523: [Alphabet cricket] 

    From The Sunday Times, 20th June 1971 [link]

    The Alphabet Cricket Club (26 playing members, every surname having a different initial letter) ran into trouble last season. The selected 1st XI consisted of those with initials A to K; the 2nd XI was to be picked from the remainder, but personal feeling had crept in. (To save space, players are referred to by initials).

    U refused to play in the same team as Z. Q said that he would not be available if either L or M was picked. P announced that he would not turn out (a) unless M was in the side, (b) if either O or W played. Z declined to play in an XI containing more than one of R, S, T. Finally, V agreed to play only with Q.

    The secretary managed to pick an XI but then a further complication arose: two of the 1st XI fell ill and two of the selected 2nd XI were taken to fill the gaps. Fortunately the secretary was still able to field a 2nd XI (which, incidentally, won, M making a century).

    Who were the two promoted to the 1st XI, and who were omitted altogether?

    This puzzle was originally published with no title.

    [teaser523]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 9:49 am on 21 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      This Python program runs in 52ms.

      from enigma import (subsets, intersect, diff, join, printf)
      
      players = "LMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ"
      
      # generate possible 2nd XI's
      def generate():
        for ps in subsets(players, size=11):
      
          # verify conditions:
      
          # "U refused to play in the same team as Z"
          if 'U' in ps and 'Z' in ps: continue
      
          # "Q said that he would not be available if either L or M was picked"
          if 'Q' in ps and ('L' in ps or 'M' in ps): continue
      
          # "P announced that he would not turn out (a) unless M was in the
          # side, (b) if either O or W played"
          if 'P' in ps and ('M' not in ps or 'O' in ps or 'W' in ps): continue
      
          # "Z declined to play in an XI containing more than one of R, S, T"
          if 'Z' in ps and len(intersect((ps, "RST"))) > 1: continue
      
          # "V agreed to play only with Q"
          if 'V' in ps and 'Q' not in ps: continue
      
          yield ps
      
      # choose two sets for the second eleven
      for (s1, s2) in subsets(generate(), size=2, select="P"):
      
        # M is in the final set
        if 'M' not in s2: continue
      
        # the two promoted are in the first but not the second
        ps = diff(s1, s2)
        if len(ps) != 2: continue
      
        # the ones who were never picked
        ns = diff(players, s1 + s2)
        printf("promoted={ps} omitted={ns} [{s1} -> {s2}]", ps=join(ps), ns=join(ns), s1=join(s1), s2=join(s2))
      
      

      Solution: Q and V were promoted. P and Z were omitted.

      The original 2nd XI was: N O Q R S T U V W X Y.

      And then Q and V were promoted to the 1st XI. L and M stepped in to take their places.

      So the actual 2nd XI was: L M N O R S T U W X Y.

      P and Z were omitted from both line-ups.

      V will play only with Q, so it makes sense that Q and V were promoted together. (Although I didn’t check that the requirements for the 2nd XI were satisfied by the new 1st XI, but in this case they would be).

      These are the only two possible line-ups allowed for the 2nd XI for the given conditions, so the one with M in must be the actual line-up.

      Like

    • John Crabtree's avatar

      John Crabtree 8:06 pm on 25 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Four players were initially not picked.
      From the two statements involving Z, if Z plays, U does not play and at least two of R, S and T do not play.

      The two statements involving Q may be written as:
      Q + ~Q.~V = 1
      Q.~L.~M + ~Q = 1
      Combining them gives Q.~L.~M + ~Q.~V = 1
      Either L and M do not play, or Q and V do not play, and so Z does not play,
      The statements involving P may be written as P.M.~O.~W + ~P = 1
      If P plays, Q, V, O, W and Z do not play. And so P does not play.

      And so Q and V were promoted. P and Z did not play.
      L and M were brought in to the 2nd XI as replacements.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 7:06 pm on 19 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 3013: Arian Pen-blwydd 

    From The Sunday Times, 21st June 2020 [link] [link]

    When I thought that my daughter was old enough to be responsible with money I gave her on her next, and all subsequent birthdays, cash amounts (in pounds) which were equal to her birthday age squared.

    On her last birthday her age was twice the number of years for which she received no such presents. I calculated at this birthday that if I had made these gifts on all of her birthdays then she would have received 15% more than she had actually received. I then decided that I would stop making the payments after her birthday when she would have received only 7.5% more if the payments had been made on all of her birthdays.

    What was the amount of the final birthday payment?

    There are now 300 puzzles available on the site.

    [teaser3013]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 9:43 pm on 19 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      If she didn’t receive gifts for the first k years, then the “missing” gifts are the sum of the squares of 1 .. k. The amounts actually received are the sum of the squares of (k + 1) .. 2k.

      This Python program finds the value of k when the amount of the missing gifts is 15% of the actual amount, and then continues looking at future gifts until the amount becomes 7.5%.

      It runs in 53ms.

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      from enigma import irange, inf, printf
      
      # solve the puzzle
      def solve():
        # consider the k years before the gifts started
        for k in irange(1, inf):
          # total before amount
          before = sum(x * x for x in irange(1, k))
          # total after amount
          after = sum(x * x for x in irange(k + 1, 2 * k))
          # before = 0.15 * after
          if not(100 * before == 15 * after): continue
          printf("k = {k}; before = {before}, after = {after}")
      
          # now add in future gifts
          future = after
          for n in irange(2 * k + 1, inf):
            future += n * n
            # before = 0.075 * future
            if not(1000 * before == 75 * future): continue
            printf("-> n = {n}; n^2 = {n2}, future = {future}", n2=n * n)
            return
      
      solve()
      

      Solution: The final gift was £ 1,764.

      The gifts started on the 18th birthday, so the “missing” gifts (years 1 – 17) would amount to £ 1,785.

      The actual gifts between ages 18 and 34 amount to £ 11,900, and 15% of £ 11,900 is £ 1,785.

      The gifts are to continue to age 42, making the total amount £ 23,800, and 7.5% of £ 23,800 is also £ 1,785.

      Which means the final gift is made on the 25th (silver) anniversary of the first gift.


      Analytically:

      (See: Enigma 1086).

      The sum of the first n squares is given by the square pyramidal numbers:

      SP(n) = n (n + 1) (2n + 1) / 6

      So the first part of the puzzle is to solve:

      SP(k) = 0.15 (SP(2k) − SP(k))
      20 SP(k) = 3 (SP(2k) − SP(k))
      23 SP(k) = 3 SP(2k)
      23k (k + 1) (2k + 1) = 6k (2k + 1) (4k + 1)
      23k + 23 = 24k + 6
      k = 17

      The second part is to solve, for n > 34:

      SP(k) = 0.075 (SP(n) − SP(k))
      3 SP(n) = 43 SP(k)
      SP(n) = 25585
      n = 42

      The required answer is then: n² = 42² = 1764.

      Like

      • Jim Randell's avatar

        Jim Randell 11:19 pm on 20 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

        Or, more simply:

        We are looking for values of n, k where:

        SP(k) = (3/43) SP(n)
        SP(2k) = (23/43) SP(n)

        This Python program runs in 51ms.

        Run: [ @repl.it ]

        from enigma import irange, inf, div, printf
        
        # accumulate the square pyramidal numbers, map: SP[n] -> n
        d = dict()
        x = 0
        for n in irange(1, inf):
          # calculate: x = SP(n)
          x += n * n
          d[x] = n
          # can we find a corresponding y = SP(k)?
          y = div(x * 3, 43)
          k = d.get(y, None)
          if k is None: continue
          # and verify z = SP(2k)
          z = div(x * 23, 43)
          k2 = d.get(z, None)
          if k2 is None or k2 != k * 2: continue
          printf("n^2={n2} [n={n} k={k}; SP[{k}]={y} SP[{k2}]={z} SP[{n}]={x}]", n2=n * n)
          break
        

        Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 7:12 am on 18 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Brainteaser 1819: Early bath 

    From The Sunday Times, 27th July 1997 [link]

    There are 20 teams in one country’s premier league. They each play each other once in the first half of the season, and then they each play each other a second time in the rest of the season. Each team plays each Saturday of the season, earning three points for a win and one point for a draw. At the end of the season the bottom three teams are relegated and the top team wins the league championship.

    Last season was the most boring ever. It was possible to determine the relegated teams well before the end of the season. In fact it would be impossible in any season to be able to determine the three relegated teams in fewer weeks.

    Three further Saturdays after the relegations were determined the league championship was also determined when the league leaders were in a 0-0 draw and then found that they were unassailable. There were great celebrations that night.

    At that time, how many points did the current top two teams have?

    This puzzle is included in the book Brainteasers (2002). The puzzle text above is taken from the book.

    [teaser1819]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 7:12 am on 18 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      After a tortuous chain of reasoning we arrive at the answer:

      In the first half of the season there are C(20, 2) = 190 matches, and then another 190 in the second half of the season. Each team plays 19 matches in the first half of the season, and another 19 matches in the second half of the season. The season lasts 38 weeks, with 10 matches played each week.

      At some point there are 3 teams doomed to relegation, as they cannot possibly catch up with any of the remaining 17 teams.

      Suppose in the first half of the tournament there are three teams that lose all their matches, except the matches they play amongst themselves, which are drawn.

      Each of the three doomed teams has only 2 points (from their draws with the other two doomed teams). If all the other 187 matches were won outright there are 187×3 = 561 points to distribute between the remaining 17 teams. This gives an average of 33 points per team. But, if one of the doomed teams were to win all their matches in the second half of the tournament they would end up with 2 + 3×19 = 59 points, so their relegation is not guaranteed by the end of the first half of the tournament.

      If we carry on for k weeks into the second half of the tournament, with each doomed team losing each of their matches, and each of the other matches being won, then how many weeks is it before enough points are accumulated, so that each of the 17 remaining teams are out of reach?

      There are (19 − k) weeks remaining and a doomed team could win all their remaining matches, so they would end with 2 + 3(19 − k) = 59 − 3k points.

      And the total number of points to be shared between the 17 remaining teams would be: 561 + 30k.

      This can happen when:

      (561 + 30k) / 17 > 59 − 3k
      561 + 30k > 1003 − 51k
      81k > 442
      k > 5.46…

      i.e. after the 6th week of the second half of the tournament, at the earliest.

      There would then be 13 weeks remaining, so a doomed team that had a sudden change of fortune could finish with 2 + 3×13 = 41 points. But by that stage in the tournament 561 + 30×6 = 741 points could have been scored by the remaining 17 teams, which is enough for each of them to have accumulated at 43 points each. So the doomed teams can indeed be doomed to relegation.

      Now after three more weeks, i.e. after the 9th week of the second half of the tournament, with 10 weeks remaining, the championship was determined. So the team with the most points must be more than 30 points ahead of the next highest team.

      If we go back to 6th week of the second half of the tournament, then 16 of the 17 non-doomed teams could have 42 points, and the other team could have 69 points. So they are 27 points ahead.

      If they win the following 2 weeks, and the week after that they draw (as we are told in the puzzle text), then after the 9th week they have 76 points, and in order to be unassailable the next highest team can have no more than 45.

      So now we need to make sure none of the other 16 teams can get more than 45 points by the end of week 9. An easy way is to suppose all the matches apart from the ones involving the future champions are drawn.

      Then at the end of the 7th week, the best any of the 16 challengers can do is 43 points. The future champions have 72 points, and there are 12 weeks remaining, so they are assailable.

      At the end of the 8th week, the best any of the challengers can do is 44 points. The future champions have 75 points, and there are 11 weeks remaining, so they are still assailable.

      At the end of the 9th week, the best any of the challengers can do is 45 points. The future champions have 76 points, and there are 10 weeks remaining, so they are now unassailable.

      So this is a viable scenario for the puzzle.

      Solution: The top team had 76 points, and the next highest team had 45 points.

      Like

      • John Crabtree's avatar

        John Crabtree 5:14 pm on 19 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

        This teaser just works. After 6 weeks of the second half, 16 teams have 42 points and one has 69, ie a total of 741 for those teams and the maximum possible.

        Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 8:42 am on 16 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 2662: Number please 

    From The Sunday Times, 29th September 2013 [link] [link]

    I finally got through to the operator of a large company and asked to be connected to an appropriate department. He tried eight different extension numbers before then finding the correct one. The eight numbers were 1933, 2829, 3133, 4630, 5089, 5705, 6358 and 6542. Curiously, each of these wrong numbers did have at least one correct digit of the correct extension in the correct position!

    What was the correct extension number?

    [teaser2662]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 8:42 am on 16 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Here is a recursive program that starts with unassigned digits in all positions, and then at each step looks for a number that doesn’t already match and uses it to fill out one of the unassigned digits. It runs in 53ms.

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      from enigma import (update, join, printf)
      
      # find sequences that match ns in at least one position
      # ds - candidate digits ('?' for unassigned)
      # ns - remaining numbers to check
      def solve(ds, ns):
        # are we done?
        if not ns:
          yield join(ds)
        else:
          # consider the digits of the next number
          ms = list(zip(ds, ns[0]))
          # if any digits already match move on to the next one
          if any(a == b for (a, b) in ms):
            yield from solve(ds, ns[1:])
          else:
            # set one of the unassigned digits
            for (i, (a, b)) in enumerate(ms):
              if a == '?':
                yield from solve(update(ds, [(i, b)]), ns[1:])
      
      # numbers provided
      numbers = "1933 2829 3133 4630 5089 5705 6358 6542".split()
      
      # solve the puzzle, starting with 4 ?'s
      for n in solve("????", numbers):
        printf("number = {n}")
      

      Solution: The correct extension number is 6739.


      A brute force search of all possible extension numbers is shorter, and only slightly slower:

      from enigma import (subsets, join, printf)
      
      # the numbers tried (each has at least one correct digit in the correct position)
      numbers = "1933 2829 3133 4630 5089 5705 6358 6542".split()
      
      # consider digits for the actual number
      for ds in subsets("0123456789", size=4, select="M"):
        if all(any(a == b for (a, b) in zip(ds, n)) for n in numbers):
          printf("number = {n}", n=join(ds))
      

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 10:29 am on 6 October 2020 Permalink | Reply

      
      % A Solution in MiniZinc 
      include "globals.mzn";
      
      var 0..9: A; var 0..9: B; var 0..9: C; var 0..9: D;
      
      constraint all_different ([A,B,C,D]);
      
      % Each of these wrong numbers did have at least one correct
      % digit of the correct extension in the correct position
      
      % Extn Try 1 - 1933 
      constraint sum ([A==1,B==9,C==3,D==3]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 2 - 2829 
      constraint sum ([A==2,B==8,C==2,D==9]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 3 - 3133 
      constraint sum ([A==3,B==1,C==3,D==3]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 4 - 4630 
      constraint sum ([A==4,B==6,C==3,D==0]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 5 - 5089 
      constraint sum ([A==5,B==0,C==8,D==9]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 6 - 5705 
      constraint sum ([A==5,B==7,C==0,D==5]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 7 - 6358  
      constraint sum ([A==6,B==3,C==5,D==8]) > 0;
      
      % Extn Try 8 - 6542 
      constraint sum ([A==6,B==5,C==4,D==2]) > 0;
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      output ["The correct extension number is " ++
      show(A),show(B),show(C),show(D) ];
      
      % The correct extension number is 6739
      % % time elapsed: 0.03 s
      % ----------
      % ==========
      
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 12:18 pm on 14 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 2655: Sudoprime 

    From The Sunday Times, 11th August 2013 [link] [link]

    The grid shows a cross-figure with two of its digits given. The eleven answers (five of them being “across” and the other six “down”) are all different prime numbers with no leading zeros. No digit appears more than once in any row, column or main diagonal.

    What are the two largest of the eleven primes?

    [teaser2655]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 12:19 pm on 14 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      See also: Enigma 1730, Enigma 1740, Enigma 1755.

      I used the [[ SubstitutedExpression() ]] solver from the enigma.py library to solve this puzzle. The condition that there are no repeated digits in the rows, columns or diagonals can be expressed using the [[ --distinct ]] parameter, which lets us specify multiple groups of symbols, where none of the groups may contain repeated digits.

      The following run file executes in 93ms.

      Run: [ @replit ]

      #! python -m enigma -rr
      
      SubstitutedExpression
      
      #
      #  A # # # B
      #  C D # E F
      #  # G H I #
      #  J K # L M
      #  N # # # P
      #
      
      # the two values we are given
      --assign="G,8"
      --assign="N,7"
      
      # the 11 answers are all different prime numbers
      "is_prime(AC)"
      "is_prime(BF)"
      "is_prime(CD)"
      "is_prime(EF)"
      "is_prime(JK)"
      "is_prime(LM)"
      "is_prime(JN)"
      "is_prime(MP)"
      "all_different(AC, BF, CD, EF, JK, LM, JN, MP)"
      
      "is_prime(DGK)"
      "is_prime(EIL)"
      "is_prime(GHI)"
      "all_different(DGK, EIL, GHI)"
      
      # no digit appears more than once in any row, column, or main diagonal
      --distinct="AB,CDEF,GHI,JKLM,NP,ACJN,DGK,EIL,BFMP,ADHLP,NKHEB"
      
      # answer is the two largest primes
      --code="ans = lambda *vs: last(sorted(vs), 2, fn=tuple)"
      --answer="ans(DGK, EIL, GHI)"
      
      # suppress verbose output
      --template=""
      

      Solution: The two largest primes are: 821, 983.

      The completed grid looks like this:

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 3:21 pm on 14 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      % A Solution in MiniZinc - same grid as Jim
      include "globals.mzn";
      
      var 1..9:A; var 1..9:B; var 1..9:C; var 1..9:D; var 1..9:E; 
      var 1..9:F; var 1..9:G; var 1..9:H; var 1..9:I; var 1..9:J; 
      var 1..9:K; var 1..9:L; var 1..9:M; var 1..9:N; var 1..9:P; 
      
      % Given values
      constraint G == 8 /\ N == 7;
      
      % Rows
      var 11..97:CD = 10*C + D; 
      var 11..97:EF = 10*E + F; 
      var 11..97:JK = 10*J + K; 
      var 11..97:LM = 10*L + M; 
      var 101..997:GHI = 100*G + 10*H + I;
      % Columns
      var 11..97:AC = 10*A + C; 
      var 11..97:JN = 10*J + N; 
      var 101..997:DGK = 100*D + 10*G + K; 
      var 101..997:EIL = 100*E + 10*I + L; 
      var 11..97:BF = 10*B + F; 
      var 11..97:MP = 10*M + P; 
      
      predicate is_prime(var int: x) = 
      x > 1 /\ forall(i in 2..1 + ceil(sqrt(int2float(ub(x))))) 
      ((i < x) -> (x mod i > 0));
      
      % The eleven answers are all prime numbers
      constraint is_prime(CD) /\ is_prime(EF) /\ is_prime(JK) /\ is_prime(LM)
      /\ is_prime(GHI) /\ is_prime(AC) /\ is_prime(JN) /\ is_prime(DGK)
      /\ is_prime(EIL) /\ is_prime(BF) /\ is_prime(MP);
      
      % All the prime numbers are different
      constraint all_different([CD,EF,JK,LM,GHI,AC,JN,DGK,EIL,BF,MP]);
      
      % Top and bottom rows have different digits
      constraint A != B /\ N != P;
      
      % Other rows have different digits
      constraint all_different([C,D,E,F]) /\ all_different([G,H,I])
      /\ all_different([J,K,L,M]);
      
      % All the columns have different digits
      constraint all_different([A,C,J,N]) /\ all_different([D,G,K])
      /\ all_different([E,I,L]) /\ all_different([B,F,M,P]);
      
      % The diagonals have different digits
      constraint all_different([A,D,H,L,P]) /\ all_different([B,E,H,K,N]);
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      output ["Three digit primes are : " ++ show([DGK,GHI,EIL])
      ++ "\nA, B, C, D, E, F = " ++ show([A,B,C,D,E,F])
      ++ "\nG, H, I, J, K, L = " ++ show([G,H,I,J,K,L])
      ++ "\nM, N, P = " ++ show([M,N,P]) ];
      
      % Three digit primes are : [983, 821, 617]
      % A, B, C, D, E, F = [6, 9, 1, 9, 6, 7]
      % G, H, I, J, K, L = [8, 2, 1, 4, 3, 7]
      % M, N, P = [1, 7, 3]
      % ----------
      % ==========
      % Grid solution
      % 6 # # # 9
      % 1 9 # 6 7
      % # 8 2 1 #
      % 4 3 # 7 1
      % 7 # # # 3
      
      
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 4:48 pm on 12 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 3012: Number blind rage 

    From The Sunday Times, 14th June 2020 [link] [link]

    After school, angry at getting “50 lines”, I kicked my satchel around. Impacts made my 11-digit calculator switch on. An 11-digit number was also entered and the display was damaged. Strangely, I found “dYSCALCULIA” displayed and saved this to memory (as shown).

    After various tests I confirmed that all arithmetic operations were correct and the decimal point would appear correctly if needed. No segments were permanently “on”, two digits were undamaged, and for the other digits, overall, several segments were permanently “off”.

    Retrieving “dYSCALCULIA”, I divided it by 9, then the result by 8, then that result by 7, then that result by 6. No decimal point appeared and the last result (at the right-hand side of the display) had three digits appearing as numerals.

    What number was “dYSCALCULIA”?

    [teaser3012]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 9:07 pm on 12 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I used the standard set of digits (as illustrated in Enigma 1701).

      This Python program runs in 90ms.

      from itertools import product
      from enigma import join, div, printf
      
      # normal digits
      normal = "0123456789"
      
      # map digits to illuminated segments, arranged as:
      #
      #   0
      # 1   2
      #   3
      # 4   5
      #   6
      #
      # map digits to segments
      f = lambda *ss: frozenset(ss)
      seg = {
        # normal digits
        '0': f(0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6),
        '1': f(2, 5),
        '2': f(0, 2, 3, 4, 6),
        '3': f(0, 2, 3, 5, 6),
        '4': f(1, 2, 3, 5),
        '5': f(0, 1, 3, 5, 6),
        '6': f(0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6), # or could be (1, 3, 4, 5, 6)
        '7': f(0, 2, 5), # or could be (0, 1, 2, 5)
        '8': f(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6),
        '9': f(0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6), # or could be (0, 1, 2, 3, 5)
        # malformed digits
        'a': f(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5),
        'c': f(0, 1, 4, 6),
        'd': f(2, 3, 4, 5, 6),
        'l': f(1, 4, 6),
        'u': f(1, 2, 4, 5, 6),
      }
      # map segments to normal digits
      norm = dict((seg[k], k) for k in normal)
      
      # the display
      display = "d45calcul1a"
      
      # compute possible replacement (superset) digits for the symbols
      r = dict((k, list(d for d in normal if seg[d].issuperset(seg[k]))) for k in set(display))
      
      # choose possible replacement digits for the symbols
      for ds in product(*(r[x] for x in display)):
        if ds[0] == '0': continue
        # two of the digits are unaffected
        if sum(x == y and x in normal for (x, y) in zip(display, ds)) < 2: continue
        # make the number
        n = int(join(ds))
        # and the result
        s = div(n, 9 * 8 * 7 * 6)
        if s is None: continue
        # remove broken segments from the result
        # x = original display, y = original digit, z = result digit
        rs = list(
          norm.get(seg[z].difference(seg[y].difference(seg[x])), '?')
            for (x, y, z) in zip(display[::-1], ds[::-1], str(s)[::-1])
        )
        # there should be 3 normal digits
        if len(rs) - rs.count('?') != 3: continue
        # output solution
        printf("{n} -> {s} -> {rs}", rs=join(rs[::-1]))
      

      Solution: dYSCALCULIA = 84588800688.

      The digits displaying 4 and 5 must be the undamaged ones.

      So the segments that are definitely broken are as shown below:

      There are 22 segments that are definitely broken, and a further 3 that we cannot determine if they are broken or not.

      The result of dividing the number by 9×8×7×6 = 3024 is 27972487, which would look something like this:

      (Only showing the segments that we definitely know to be broken, there are two segments shown lit that may be broken).

      The 2nd digit (7) displays as a 7. The 7th digit (8) displays as a 1. The 8th digit (7) displays as a 7.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 11:18 am on 11 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: by: Ann Kindersley   

    Brain-Teaser 522: [Palindromic phone numbers] 

    From The Sunday Times, 13th June 1971 [link]

    The other day I noticed some strange coincidences about the telephone numbers of my three friends.

    Each number reads the same from left to right and vice versa. The first and third digit formed the owner’s age, as did the sum of all the digits of his number and, furthermore, his number was divisible by his age.

    What were my friends’ ages?

    This puzzle was originally published with no title.

    [teaser522]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 11:20 am on 11 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Assuming the ages cannot have a leading zero (which means the phone numbers can’t either) gives us a unique solution to the puzzle.

      This Python program uses the [[ SubstitutedExpression() ]] solver from the enigma.py library to try 3-, 4- and 5-digit numbers satisfying the required conditions. It runs in 54ms.

      from enigma import (sprintf as f, join, SubstitutedExpression, subsets, all_different, printf)
      
      # alphametic forms for possible palindromic phone numbers
      numbers = [ 'ABA', 'ABBA', 'ABCBA' ]
      
      # collect possible (number, age) solutions
      ss = list()
      
      # consider possible phone numbers
      for n in numbers:
        # age is 1st and 3rd digit
        a = n[0] + n[2]
        
        exprs = [
          # sum of digits is the same as age
          f("{s} = {a}", s=join(n, sep=" + ")),
          # the number itself is divisible by the age
          f("{n} % {a} = 0"),
        ]
      
        # solve the alphametic expressions
        p = SubstitutedExpression(exprs, distinct="", answer=f("({n}, {a})"))
        ss.extend(p.answers(verbose=0))
      
      # choose three solutions with different ages
      for (A, B, C) in subsets(ss, size=3):
        if not all_different(A[1], B[1], C[1]): continue
        printf("A={A} B={B} C={C}")
      

      Solution: The ages are: 21, 23, 27.

      The corresponding phone numbers are: 28182, 28382, 28782.

      These are the only three solutions for 5-digit phone numbers, and there are no solutions for 3- or 4-digit phone numbers.

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 4:48 pm on 16 July 2021 Permalink | Reply

      % A Solution in MiniZinc 
      % assumes 5-digit tel. no. is ABCBA
      include "globals.mzn";
      
      var 1..9:A; var 0..9:B; var 0..9:C; 
      
      var 10..100: age1;
      
      var 10000..99999: ABCBA = 10001*A + 1010*B + 100*C; 
      
      constraint age1 == 10*A + C /\ age1 == 2*A + 2*B + C
      /\ ABCBA mod age1 == 0;
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      output ["Age = " ++ show(age1) ++ ", Tel. No. = " ++ show(ABCBA) ];
      
      % Age = 21, Tel. No. = 28182
      % ----------
      % Age = 23, Tel. No. = 28382
      % ----------
      % Age = 27, Tel. No. = 28782
      % ----------
      % ==========
      
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 9:33 am on 9 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: by: Ernest J Luery,   

    Brain-Teaser 521: [Names and occupations] 

    From The Sunday Times, 6th June 1971 [link]

    There were six. Messrs. Butcher, Carpenter, Draper, Farmer, Grocer and Miller,  who shared the fire-watching on Friday nights — three this week, three the next. By occupation they were (not necessarily respectively) a butcher, a carpenter, a draper, a farmer, a grocer and a miller.

    Incidents were few and far between, until that Saturday morning when they found the “log” book signed by the Acting Deputy Assistant something or other, as follows: “All three present and fast asleep”.

    Something had to be done about it: they decided to watch, to play whist, and to keep awake in the future. It was arranged thus: four did duty this week, next week two stood down and two others came in, and so on. Each did two turns in three weeks.

    On the first Friday the carpenter, the draper, the farmer and the miller watched. Next week Mr Carpenter, Mr Draper, Mr Farmer and Mr Grocer played. On the third occasion Mr Butcher played against Mr Grocer, Mr Farmer against the butcher, and the miller against the draper. Each night the four cut for partners and kept them till morning.

    If Mr Carpenter’s occupation is the same as the name of the one whose occupation is the same as the name of the one whose occupation is the same as the one whose occupation is the same as the name of the miller:

    What is Mr Miller’s occupation?

    As presented this puzzle has no solutions. In the comments I give a revised version that does have a unique answer.

    This puzzle was originally published with no title.

    [teaser521]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 9:33 am on 9 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I thought the tricky bit in this puzzle would be detangling the long obfuscated condition at the end (and decide if there was a “the name of” missing from it). But it turns out we can show that there are no solutions before we get that far, so the puzzle is flawed.

      In week 3 we have the following pairs (Mr Butcher + Mr Grocer), (Mr Farmer + the butcher), (the miller + the draper).

      But there are only four people (i.e. two pairs), so one of the pairs is repeated. The middle one doesn’t overlap with either of the outer two, so the outer two must refer to the same pair. i.e. (Mr Butcher + Mr Grocer) = (the miller + the draper).

      In week 2 we had Mr Carpenter, Mr Draper, Mr Farmer and Mr Grocer. And Mr Farmer and Mr Grocer stayed on for week 3, which means they can’t have done week 1.

      The jobs missing from week 1 are the butcher and the grocer, so: (Mr Farmer + Mr Grocer) = (the butcher + the grocer).

      But Mr Grocer cannot be one of (the miller + the draper) and also one of (the butcher + the grocer).

      So the described situation is not possible.


      However if we change the names in the second week to match the jobs from the first week (which I think makes for a more pleasing puzzle), and also insert the missing “the name of” into the final obfuscated condition we get the following revised puzzle:

      On the first Friday the carpenter, the draper, the farmer and the miller watched. Next week Mr Carpenter, Mr Draper, Mr Farmer and Mr Miller played. On the third occasion Mr Butcher played against Mr Grocer, Mr Farmer against the butcher, and the miller against the draper. Each night the four cut for partners and kept them till morning.

      If Mr Carpenter’s occupation is the same as the name of the one whose occupation is the same as the name of the one whose occupation is the same as the name of the one whose occupation is the same as the name of the miller:

      What is Mr Miller’s occupation?

      Then we get a puzzle that does have solutions (although not the same as the published solution).

      The following Python program runs in 54ms.

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      from enigma import (irange, subsets, multiset, map2str, printf)
      
      # labels for the names and jobs
      labels = (B, C, D, F, G, M) = irange(0, 5)
      
      # check the schedule for the 3 weeks
      def check(w1, w2, w3):
        m = multiset()
        for w in (w1, w2, w3):
          w = set(w)
          # 4 different people each week
          if len(w) != 4: return False
          m.update_from_seq(w)
        # each person does 2 duties over the 3 weeks
        return all(v == 2 for v in m.values())
      
      # map: job -> name
      for n in subsets(labels, size=len, select="P"):
      
        # Week 1 = carpenter, draper, farmer, miller
        w1 = [n[C], n[D], n[F], n[M]]
        # Week 2 = Carpenter, Draper, Farmer, Miller
        w2 = [C, D, F, M] # NOT: [C, D, F, G]
        # Week 3 = Butcher + Grocer, Farmer + butcher, miller + draper
        # so: Butcher + Grocer = miller + draper
        if not(set([B, G]) == set([n[M], n[D]])): continue
        w3 = [B, G, F, n[B]]
      
        if not check(w1, w2, w3): continue
      
        # "Mr Carpenter's occupation is the same as the name of the one
        # whose occupation is the same as the name of the one whose
        # occupation is the same as the [name of] one whose occupation is
        # the same as the name of the miller"
        if not(n[n[n[n[n[M]]]]] == C): continue
      
        # output the map
        names = ("Butcher", "Carpenter", "Draper", "Farmer", "Grocer", "Miller")
        jobs = list(x.lower() for x in names)
        printf("{s}", s=map2str(((names[n], j) for (n, j) in zip(n, jobs)), sep="; ", enc=""))
      

      Solution: Mr Miller is the carpenter.

      There are three ways to assign the jobs to the names:

      Butcher=draper; Carpenter=butcher; Draper=farmer; Farmer=grocer; Grocer=miller; Miller=carpenter
      Butcher=miller; Carpenter=butcher; Draper=farmer; Farmer=grocer; Grocer=draper; Miller=carpenter
      Butcher=miller; Carpenter=farmer; Draper=butcher; Farmer=grocer; Grocer=draper; Miller=carpenter

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 5:14 pm on 5 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 3011: Optical illusion 

    From The Sunday Times, 7th June 2020 [link] [link]

    George and Martha are studying optics. If you place an object a specific distance from a lens, an image will appear at a distance from that lens according the following formula:

    The reciprocal of the object distance plus the reciprocal of the image distance is equal to the reciprocal of the focal length of the lens.

    The object distance was a two-digit whole number of cm (ab). The image distance and the focal length of the lens were also two-digit whole numbers (cd and ef respectively). The six digits were all different and non-zero. Also, the object distance and the focal length were of the same parity and b was an exact multiple of d. Martha pointed out that the sum of those three two-digit numbers was a prime number.

    What was that prime number?

    [teaser3011]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 5:27 pm on 5 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I used uppercase letters for the alphametic symbols, as that is more usual.

      We can use the [[ SubstitutedExpression() ]] solver from the enigma.py library, to solve the relevant alphametic expressions. The following run file executes in 104ms.

      Run: [ @replit ]

      #! python -m enigma -rr
      
      SubstitutedExpression
      
      --digits="1-9"
      
      "fraction(1, AB, 1, CD) == (1, EF)"
      "B % 2 == F % 2"
      "div(B, D) > 1"
      "is_prime(AB + CD + EF)"
      
      --answer="AB + CD + EF"
      

      Solution: The sum of the numbers is 211.

      The object distance is 78 cm, the image distance is 91 cm and the focal length is 42 cm.

      (1 / 78) + (1 / 91) = (1 / 42)

      The optical constraint and multiple constraint (lines 12 and 14) are sufficient to arrive at a unique answer to the puzzle.


      However, if we remove the constraint that the symbols stand for different digits there is a further solution:

      (1 / 28) + (1 / 21) = (1 / 12)

      In this case the numbers sum to 61.

      Like

    • GeoffR's avatar

      GeoffR 7:33 pm on 5 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      % A Solution in MiniZinc
      include "globals.mzn";
      
      var 1..9: a; var 1..9: b; var 1..9: c; 
      var 1..9: d; var 1..9: e; var 1..9: f;
      
      constraint all_different ([a, b, c, d, e, f]);
      
      var 10..99: ab = 10*a + b;  % object distance
      var 10..99: cd = 10*c + d;  % image distance
      var 10..99: ef = 10*e + f;  % focal length
      
      predicate is_prime(var int: x) = 
      x > 1 /\ forall(i in 2..1 + ceil(sqrt(int2float(ub(x)))))
       ((i < x) -> (x mod i > 0));
       
      % optical formula is  1/ab + 1/cd = 1/ef, so... 
      constraint (cd * ef) + (ab * ef) == (ab * cd);
      
      % parity is same for numbers ab and ef
      constraint ab mod 2 == ef mod 2;
      
      % b was an exact multiple of d
      constraint b div d > 1 /\ b mod d == 0;
      
      % sum of three two-digit numbers was a prime number
      constraint is_prime(ab + cd + ef);
      
      solve satisfy;
      
      output ["Prime number is " ++ show(ab + cd + ef) ++
      "\nab = " ++ show(ab) ++ ", cd = " ++ show(cd) ++ ", ef = " ++ show(ef)];
      
      
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 12:06 pm on 4 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Teaser 2860: Cricketing greats 

    From The Sunday Times, 16th July 2017 [link] [link]

    On each of the next seven evenings a different media pundit will advocate the merits of two cricketers. The pundits are Agnew, Blofeld, Dagnall, Mann, Mitchell, Norcross and Smith. The fourteen cricketers to be discussed are Ali, Anderson, Ball, Ballance, Broad, Carberry, Compton, Hales, Kerrigan, Patel, Stokes, Tredwell, Trescothick and Woakes. Each evening, looking at the names of the pundit and the two cricketers, then for any two out of the three names there are just two letters of the alphabet that occur (once or more) in both.

    (a) Which cricketers will Dagnall advocate?
    (b) Which cricketers will Norcross advocate?

    [teaser2860]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 12:07 pm on 4 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      See: Teaser 2959.

      I incorporated the [[ gangs() ]] function into the [[ grouping ]] code that is available in the enigma.py library, and we can use it to solve this puzzle.

      The following Python code runs in 53ms.

      Run: [ @repl.it ]

      from enigma import (grouping, diff)
      
      # gang leaders (in solving order)
      pundits = ( 'Dagnall', 'Norcross', 'Agnew', 'Blofeld', 'Mann', 'Mitchell', 'Smith' )
      
      # gang followers
      cricketers = (
        'Ali', 'Anderson', 'Ball', 'Ballance', 'Broad', 'Carberry', 'Compton',
        'Hales', 'Kerrigan', 'Patel', 'Stokes', 'Tredwell', 'Trescothick', 'Woakes'
      )
      
      # selection function
      fn = grouping.share_letters(2)
      
      # find possible 2-gangs for Dagnall and Norcross
      for (g1, g2) in grouping.gangs(2, pundits[0:2], cricketers, fn):
        # check the remaining gangs can be made
        for gs in grouping.gangs(2, pundits[2:], diff(cricketers, g1 + g2), fn):
          grouping.output_gangs(pundits, [g1, g2] + gs)
          # we only need one example
          break
      

      Solution: (a) Dagnall advocates Ball and Broad; (b) Norcross advocates Ballance and Woakes.

      The program checks that the remaining gangs can be formed, and it turns out that there is only one way to do this:

      Dagnall: Ball, Broad
      Norcross: Ballance, Woakes
      Agnew: Carberry, Tredwell
      Blofeld: Patel, Trescothick
      Mann: Anderson, Compton
      Mitchell: Ali, Kerrigan
      Smith: Hales, Stokes

      So we could just use the following even shorter program to find all possible groupings:

      from enigma import grouping
      
      # gang leaders
      pundits = ( 'Dagnall', 'Norcross', 'Agnew', 'Blofeld', 'Mann', 'Mitchell', 'Smith' )
      
      # gang followers
      cricketers = (
        'Ali', 'Anderson', 'Ball', 'Ballance', 'Broad', 'Carberry', 'Compton',
        'Hales', 'Kerrigan', 'Patel', 'Stokes', 'Tredwell', 'Trescothick', 'Woakes'
      )
      
      # find 2-gangs
      for gs in grouping.gangs(2, pundits, cricketers, grouping.share_letters(2)):
        grouping.output_gangs(pundits, gs)
      

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    Jim Randell 8:11 am on 2 June 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Teaser 2566: A fulfilling strategy 

    From The Sunday Times, 27th November 2011 [link] [link]

    I drove down a road with a number of petrol stations whose locations I saw on my map. I decided to check the price at the first station then fill up when I found one offering a lower price (or, failing that, the last one).

    When I got home I noticed that I could arrange the prices (in pence per litre) into an ascending sequence of consecutive whole numbers of pence, plus 0.9p (i.e. 130.9p, 131.9p, 132.2p, etc). I also worked out the average price that I would expect to pay using this strategy, if I were to encounter this set of prices in an unknown order, and I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be a whole number of pence per litre.

    How many petrol stations were there?

    When the puzzle was originally published in The Sunday Times it had been edited into a form that meant there were no solutions. Here I have rephrased the middle paragraph so that it works as the setter originally intended.

    [teaser2566]

     
    • Jim Randell's avatar

      Jim Randell 8:12 am on 2 June 2020 Permalink | Reply

      (See also: Teaser 2988).

      Here is a program that calculates the result directly. It runs in 50ms.

      Run: [ @replit ]

      from enigma import (subsets, irange, inf, factorial, div, printf)
      
      # strategy, take the first amount lower than the first n items
      def strategy(s, n):
        t = min(s[:n])
        for x in s[n:]:
          if x < t: break
        return x
      
      # play the game with k items
      def play(k):
        # collect total amount
        t = 0
        # consider possible orderings of the items
        ps = list(1299 + 10 * p for p in irange(1, k))
        for s in subsets(ps, size=k, select="P"):
          t += strategy(s, 1)
        return t
      
      # consider numbers of items
      for k in irange(2, inf):
        t = play(k)
        # calculate the average expected price (in 10th pence)
        d = factorial(k)
        p = div(t, d)
        if p is not None and p % 10 == 0:
          printf("k={k} -> p={p}")
          break
      

      Solution: There were 5 petrol stations.

      And the expected average fuel price was 132.0 pence.

      It doesn’t actually matter what the prices actually are, all the petrol stations could adjust their prices by the same whole number of pence, and the expected average price would be adjusted by the same amount.


      Analytically:

      As determined in Teaser 2988 we can use the formula:

      S(n, k) = ((2n + 1)k − n(n + 1)) (k + 1) / 2(n + 1)k

      To determine the mean expected value of choosing from k boxes with values from 1..k, using the strategy of picking the next box that is better than any of the first n boxes (or the last box if there are no boxes better than the first).

      In this case n = 1:

      S(1, k) = (3k − 2) (k + 1) / 4k

      If we award ourselves a prize of value k for selecting the cheapest fuel, and a prize of value 1 for selecting the most expensive fuel, then we have the same situation as in Teaser 2988, and if p is expected average prize value, then the corresponding expected average fuel price is (130.9 + k − p).

      And k is an integer, so in order to make the expected average fuel price a whole number of pence we are looking for expected average prize value that is an integer plus 0.9.

      i.e. when the value of 10 S(1, k) is an integer with a residue of 9 modulo 10.

      10 S(1, k) = (15k + 5) / 2 − (5 / k)

      When k is odd, the first part gives us a whole number, so we would also need the (5 / k) part to give a whole number. i.e. k = 1, 5.

      When k is even, the first part gives us an odd number of halves, so we also need (5 / k) to give an odd number of halves. i.e. k = 2, 10.

      And we are only interested in values of k > 1, so there are just 3 values to check:

      k = 5: 10 S(1, k) = 39
      k = 2: 10 S(1, k) = 15
      k = 10: 10 S(1, k) = 77

      The only value for k that gives a residue of 9 modulo 10 is k = 5.

      And in this case our expected average prize is p = 3.9 so our expected average fuel price is 132.0 pence.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started